However, what I want to discuss today is why impressionism looks relatively easy to pull off, but in reality, is very difficult.
I certainly wouldn't call my painting impressionism. It is much too much representational realism. What I wanted to paint was impressionism.
Why is this difficult? I can only speak for myself. I tend to paint what I see, and what I see with my well corrected near-sightedness is a clear picture, at least with my still lifes. For some reason they are turning out all too realistic.
My landscapes, on the other hand, are easier for me to paint impressionistically, so that's something.
I'm currently re-reading the book, Monet & Bazille A Collaboration, by Kermit Champa and Dianne Pitman. Two passages stand out that I want to share, speaking about Monet:
"Monet devises his view so as to present that complexity (of texture and tone) through a nervous web of dots and dabs that rattle visually at persistly "high speed"...
"It (the light) has the appearance of never having been painted, perhaps never having been seen (or even having existed) visually before Monet discovered and delivered it in paint."
So, that's all there is to it, huh?